EZ* doesn't know what abiogenesis is; says it's not a part of evolution

*Evolutionary zealot

Paul from Wizbang continues to find himself the target of criticism from the more-evolved-than-thou evolutionary zealots:

I've taken a ton of grief over my evolution posts. With the bulk of it coming from "The Commissar."

Today while reading one of my posts, he ran across the word "Abiogenesis." This is what he said about it to his readers:

"Abby ... what?" It got me, too. "Abiogenesis" mean "life from no life," or "there was no life, and then there was." (I suspect that those definitions are almost as bad as Paul's. Corrections welcomed.)

He had never even heard the term! This moron wants to tell the whole world how much more than me he knows about this stuff and he does not even know the meaning of abiogenesis. They he proceeds to tell me what it means. Next he will we lecture me on Nuclear Physics and then ask his readers what an electron is.

Indeed. How exactly does one learn about evolution without learning even the basic definition of abiogenesis? Skip a day in junior high biology class?

Ah, but the zealot makes the claim that "evolutionary theory makes NO CLAIM AT ALL about how life began. It's about the process." Riiiiight. That's like claiming, "Well, I don't have the slighest clue how this car was built, but boy, do I know how it works!" If you're a mechanic, shouldn't you know how cars are put together? And if you're a defender of evolution, shouldn't you know how life came into being? Evolution had a beginning, did it not? And wouldn't that beginning be abiogenesis? Why do evolutionists get a free pass when it comes to this? They're usually the ones who jump all over Christians who dare to say "I don't know." Ah, but they say "I don't know" and that's it. End of story.