"Sustainable stocks" makes Algore's killing of sea bass a-ok

So say the liberals:

Gore Wedding Comes Back to Bite Bloggers on the Bass (an almost clever title)

Smearing Gore (yet again)

Al Gore - One Class Act Fish and ALL

Joining the dots on an anti-Gore story

Al Gore: Not Omnipotent

It's tough to be Al Gore

Sustainable stocks? Well, whoop-dee-doo. Does that mean I can go out and capture a few endangered - but tasty! - species, produce a sustainable stock of them and eat them? I seriously doubt it. The environmentalist nuts would be quick to condemn me for it even if I made sure to replace and even add to the number of animals I removed from the wild.

Of course, there is also the matter that the enviros aren't talking about: "sustainable stock" means "captive." I'm betting these fish don't have much room to roam. Remember how up in arms the liberals were about the spotted owl back in the 1980s? They claimed that the owls needed thousands - even tens of thousands - of acres to live. Undoubtedly, keeping these fish captive for the sole purpose of yanking them out of the water, cleaning them while they are still alive and serving them up on a plate is cruel, isn't it? I mean, you know how these people are when it comes to slaughtering chickens and cows. Anyway, why aren't these people rallying to have the "sustainable stocks" used to repopulate the wild population? Maybe then the wild population wouldn't be endangered anymore and this would no longer be an issue.

I guess when it comes to tasty fish, some things are more important than others.