I think this is awesome:
Arkansas couple welcomes 17th childLITTLE ROCK, Ark. - It's a girl — again — for the Duggars. Jim Bob and Michelle Duggar welcomed their 17th child, and seventh daughter, into the world Thursday.
Jennifer Danielle was born at 10:01 a.m. at Saint Mary's Hospital in Rogers, Ark., the Duggars said in an interview. Jennifer weighed 8 pounds, 8 ounces and arrived five days after Michelle's due date.
The Duggars obviously love their children and are capable of supporting such a large family. I say God bless them!
Of course, such a large family of faith and love draws the ire of the far left loons on Democrat Underground. Here's an edited sampling from
this thread:
Beaverhausen Donating Member (1000+ posts)
Thu Aug-02-07 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. Oh good- another season on TLC.
a******s. If you love children why not ADOPT!!!
OrangeCountyDemocrat (1000+ posts)
Thu Aug-02-07 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. Freaks!
Let's see how fast we can overpopulate this planet.
I think it's a frickin' game for these people.
laylah Donating Member (1000+ posts)
Thu Aug-02-07 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
3. With all due respect...
:puke: WTF is wrong with these people! It is not like we live in the late 19th/early 20th century before the freaking Industrial Revolution! They need to wrap that rascal or put a helmet on the soldier, for god/dess' sake!
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts)
Thu Aug-02-07 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
19. will someone cut that selfish m**********r's b***s off?
as if we needed more people
HughBeaumont Donating Member (1000+ posts)
Thu Aug-02-07 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #19
24. Snowflake # 18 will be created this week.
Seems ol' Jim Bob doesn't even wait for the cord to be cut . .
That's just a small sampling of the hate on display in that thread. There's a handful of voices of sanity like this:
tammywammy Donating Member (1000+ posts)
Thu Aug-02-07 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
22. Well, good for them
I hope their baby is happy and healthy.
If this is what they want to do, then more power to them.
tammywammy Donating Member (1000+ posts)
Thu Aug-02-07 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #65
70. I mean I don't want to have a bunch of kids
but, if they do, more power to them. :shrug:
I'm pro-choice. And it seems like they are able to support that big of a family financially.
But they are quickly drowned out by the overwhelming cacophony of baby-hating. See, when the far left says that they support "choice," what they really mean is that they support the choice of abortion and having as many abortions as you want. They don't support the choice of having children and having as many children as you want. Pathetic.
UPDATE: Another DU thread. Second verse same as the first:
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts)
Fri Aug-03-07 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. Why are these people celebrated for overbreeding
Seashell Eyes (290 posts)
Fri Aug-03-07 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. because they are white and Christian
Edited on Fri Aug-03-07 03:02 PM by Seashell Eyes
They say they are letting god dictate how many children they have. "We are so grateful to God for another gift from him." That's what really irritates me.They don't believe in personal responsibility. F*****g creates babies. Not god.
John Kerry VonErich (147 posts)
Fri Aug-03-07 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. What do you mean "personal responsibility"?
They're not bothering anyone, nor there are any signs of abuse from within.
Hrm... Low post count... Opposing view to the majority... DU typically identifies such posters as "freeper trolls" and deletes their posts and accounts.
grace0418 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Aug-03-07 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. They are overtaxing the planet, that bothers me. And abuse doesn't have to be physical.
Lack of one-on-one parental attention can have negative effects. I should know, I'm the youngest of 11. There is no physical way for two human beings to provide enough personal attention to 17 children. There simply aren't enough hours in the day. I guarantee that the older kids are getting stuck with a lot of the responsibility, unless they have an army of nannies and maids. That's not fair to the older kids or the younger ones.
People used to have large families for survival reasons. There was a lot of manual labor involved in everyday existence, and a lot of hands were needed to take care of everything. With high infant mortality rates, disease and accidents, people had to make sure that there were enough kids to survive until adulthood.
But what is the possible reason for it in today's world, where our planet is overburdened and there are millions of starving children with no families? If these people want so many kids, can't they at least adopt a few? Wouldn't that be the Christian thing?
Maybe the kids will turn out fine, but I still think it's irresponsible and selfish.
But if this woman had had her 17th abortion, that would've been responsible and selfless. Riiiiiiight.
Labels: democratic underground, duggar family, pro-choice, pro-life